COCP-359 220 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Ramesh Kumar Gupta and ors. Smt. Sakshi Sawhney, IAS DC, Amritsar and CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present : HARKESH MANUJA, submits that no interference is being made in the occupation of the petitioners in terms of the order dated 12.10.2010 passed by the Writ Court as the petitioners are even paying the rent the possession from the petitioner law. 2. not press the present petition. 3. 4. stand disposed of 27.01.2025 sanjay 59-2025 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. Date of Decision: Ramesh Kumar Gupta and ors. VERSUS Smt. Sakshi Sawhney, IAS DC, Amritsar and CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present : Mr.B.S.Bajwa, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Sarbjit Singh, Advocate for respondent No.4. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) At the outset, learned counsel for submits that no interference is being made in the occupation of the petitioners in terms of the order dated 12.10.2010 passed by the Writ Court as the petitioners are even paying the rent the possession from the petitioners shall be taken in due course of In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if an stand disposed of. .01.2025 ( Whether speaking/reasoned ? Whether Reportable ? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 359-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.01.2025 ...Petitioners Smt. Sakshi Sawhney, IAS DC, Amritsar and ors. ...Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Sarbjit Singh, Advocate for respondent No.4. At the outset, learned counsel for respondent No.4 submits that no interference is being made in the occupation of the petitioners in terms of the order dated 12.10.2010 passed by the Writ Court as the petitioners are even paying the rent thereof, however, s shall be taken in due course of learned counsel for the petitioner does Dismissed as not pressed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No Yes/No respondent No.4 submits that no interference is being made in the occupation of the petitioners in terms of the order dated 12.10.2010 passed by the Writ , however, s shall be taken in due course of learned counsel for the petitioner does y, shall also SANJAY GUPTA 2025.01.29 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document