Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16210 (GAU)

ON THE DEATH OF LATE BALENDRA BASUMATARY v. ON THE DEATH OF SMTI JYOTSHNA RANI DAS,

I.A.(Civil)/515/2025 · 2025-08-28

Susmita Phukan Khaund

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010158572024 2025:GAU-AS:11629 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/515/2025 ON THE DEATH OF LATE BALENDRA BASUMATARY HIS LEGAL HEIRS 1.1: BEDA PRATIM BASUMATARY S/O LATE BALENDRA BASUMATARY R/O VILL. KAMARKUCHI P.S. KHETRI MOUZA PANBARI DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM. 1.2: ANUJ PRATIM BASUMATARY S/O LATE BALENDRA BASUMATARY R/O VILL. KAMARKUCHI P.S. KHETRI MOUZA PANBARI DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM. 1.3: PUJA PREETEE BASUMATARY D/O LATE BALENDRA BASUMATARY R/O VILL. KAMARKUCHI P.S. KHETRI MOUZA PANBARI DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM. 2: MANJU BASUMATARY W/O SRI BALENDRA BASUMATARY R/O VILL. KAMARKUCHI P.S. KHETRI PRESENTLY RESIDING AT JAPORIGOG SILPOTA ROAD P.O. AND P.S. DISPUR Page No.# 2/3 HOUSE NO. 3 GUWAHATI 781005 DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM VERSUS ON THE DEATH OF SMTI JYOTSHNA RANI DAS, HER LEGAL HEIRS 1.1:SMTI DIBYAJYOTI DAS D/O LATE JYOTSHNA RANI DAS R/O VILL. KAMARKUCHI P.S. KEHTRI MOUZA PANBARI DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM. 2:UTTAR DEURI S/O LATE DHAR DEURI R/O VILL. KAMARKUCHI P.S. KHETRI MOUZA PANBARI DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM. 3:THE STATE OF ASSAM. REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KAMRUP (M) GUWAHATI Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B D DEKA, MR. N CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : , MR K TALUKDAR BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 29-08-2025 Heard learned counsel Mr. A. Deka is present for the applicants/appellants, who has filed this application with prayer for impleading the husband of the Page No.# 3/3 deceased respondent No. 1, who has passed away during the pendency of the appeal. 2. Learned counsel Mr. K. Talukdar is present on behalf of respondent No. 1 (a). 3. Considering the submissions at the bar, this application is allowed. 4. The husband of the deceased respondent No. 1 be impleaded in the connected appeal. 5. Appellant/applicant to file an amended cause title in the appeal. 6. In terms of the above observations, this interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant