ONKAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. BASIC EDUCATION LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/10188/2025 · 2025-09-04
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162074 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162074 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10188 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to correct the array of the parties, so far as it pertains to respondent No.3. Let necessary corrections be carried out during the course of the day.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Dr Udai Veer Singh, learned counsel for the respondents-State No.1, Shri Rakesh Chaudhary, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 to 4 and Shri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.5.
3. There is consensus at bar that the matter in issue is squarely covered by the judgment and order of this Court passed in the case of Dr Sandeep Skukla & Ors vs State of U.P. & Ors : 2025 AHC Lko 51753, decided on 01.09.2025.
4. Considering the aforesaid consensus amongst the parties, the instant writ petition is disposed of.
5. It is provided that the petitioner would also be entitled for Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yogeshwar Sharan Srivastava, Umakant Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Prashant Kumar Singh, Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary Onkar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Basic Education Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
the benefit of the judgment and order passed by this Court in the case of Sandeep Singh (supra). September 4, 2025 prateek WRIA No. 10188 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench