1 2025:CGHC:19048-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 277 of 2025 1 - Hemchand Borvanshi S/o Shri Bishhat Aged About 37 Years R/o Village Ghothiya, Police Station Khairagarh, Tahsil Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Birbaldas Mourya S/o Shri Lal Maurya Aged About 33 Years R/o Village Devkatta, Police Station Dongargarh, Tahsil Dongargarh District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Ramnarayan Sahu S/o Shri Lokuram Sahu Aged About 44 Years R/o Village Boirdih, Police Station Churiya, Tahsil Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Shiksha Vibhag, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Secretary Chhattisgarh Vyavsayik Pariksha Mandal, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Sanchalak Lokshikshan Sanchanalaya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Pariksha Niyantrak Chhattisgarh Vyavsayik Pariksha Mandal Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2025.04.29 11:12:22 +0530 2 5 - Durga Prasad Sahu S/o Shri Sant Ram Sahu R/o Village And Post Bhothli, Thana Dongargarh, Tahsil Lal Bahadur Nagar, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. 6 - Santosh Padoti S/o Shri Kuma Lal Padoti R/o Village Bhursa Tola- Ye, Post And Thana Bhortalav, Tahsil Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. 7 - Shahina Begam D/o Shri Islam Khan Aged About 39 Years R/o Sector 8, Bhilai Nagar, District Durg Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Appellant(s) : None. For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Sahgharsh Pandey, Government Advocate. For Respondent No.4 : Mr. Sourabh Pandey, Advocate. For Respondent No.6 : Mr. Deepak Diwakar, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 28.04.2025 1. This writ appeal is presented against an order dated 28.02.2025 (Hemchand Borvanshi and Others vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others) passed by the learned Single Judge in WPS No. 63 of 2020, whereby, the writ petition filed by appellants herein was dismissed by the learned Single Judge. 2. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the appellants to press this petition on repeated calls. 3 3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution on this ground alone. 4. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the concerned trial Court to proceed further. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet