MOHAMMAD SHAHID AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME, CIVIL SECTT., LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/8270/2025 · 2025-09-19
Rajeev Singh, Rajnish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162067 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162067 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8270 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None for the petitioners, whereas learned AGA for the State is present.
3. On the previous date also, learned counsel for the petitioners was not present, therefore, the case was directed to be listed in the next cause list.
4. Even otherwise the petition is misconceived for the reasons that learned AGA for the State, on the basis of instructions received from Shri Amar Singh, Sub-Inspector, Police Station-Kotwali Nagar, District Ayodhya, which has been produced before this Court and taken on record, submits that the petitioners are not being harassed.
5. In view of above, the petition is dismissed for non prosecution. September 19, 2025 Raj Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Iqbal Ahmad Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Mohammad Shahid And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home, Civil Sectt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench