Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162063 (ALL)

RADHEY SHYUAM PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WPIL/919/2025 · 2025-09-02

Manjive Shukla, Rajan Roy

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 919 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Sri Brijesh Kumar Verma, Advocate has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.4 which is taken on record. 2. Heard. 3. Petitioner alleges encroachment on Gaon Sabha land whereas learned Standing Counsel says that alleged encroacher has filed a suit wherein a temporary injunction has been granted. 4. These are not the matters to be seen under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. There are remedies prescribed under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 subject to there being any legal impediment in this regard. Petitioner, if he has a cause, can avail other remedies. 5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. September 2, 2025 Shanu/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Mohan Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Radhey Shyuam Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench