Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162062 (ALL)

RAMESH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/8527/2025 · 2025-09-09

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8527 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Vinod Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Ashok Kumar Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.59 of 2025, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C., registered at Police Station Mohanlalganj, District Lucknow. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on28.02.2025 against five persons, including the applicant, stating that the informant is an owner in possession of his agricultural land and the accused persons started claiming ownership in respect of the complainant's land on the basis of a sale deed executed on 16.04.2024 by some impostor. The applicant had witnessed the sale deed. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history. 5. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application and he has submitted that the investigation in the matter is still going on. 6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant had merely witnessed the execution of the sale deed and he was neither the executor nor the beneficiary of sale deed and there is no allegation that the applicant has received any monetary benefit out of the execution of the sale deed and the complainant has stated that the F.I.R. that he was in possession of the land dispute coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal history and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vinod Kumar Yadav, Amit Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ramesh Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) he is languishing in jail since 11.07.2025, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 7. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 8. Let the applicant - Ramesh Kumar - be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. September 9, 2025 S. Shivhare BAIL No. 8527 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench