Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162043 (ALL)

SATYAM YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/8424/2025 · 2025-09-09

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8424 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Uma Kant Gupta, learned counsel for the applicant, Smt. Kamlesh Kumari, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.247 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87 BNS and Section 7/8 of POCSO Act, registered at Police Station Bhadhokhar, District Raibareli. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 23.06.2025 stating that the applicant had enticed away the informant's sister aged 14 years. 4. In the statement of the victim recorded under Section 180 BNSS, she stated that she had gone with the applicant and she came back upon coming to know about the F.I.R. She also stated that no misdeed was committed against her. The victim declined to undergo medico-legal examination. 5. In the statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS, the victim stated that her brother had scolded and slapped her for the reason that she talked with applicant, therefore, she had gone away from her home alone. In this statement, she did not allege any allegations against the applicant. 6. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is an innocent young man aged 19 years, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history. 7. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail applicant and she has submitted that Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Uma Kant Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Satyam Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) the information of the present application has been delivered to the complainant and she has also submitted that the allegations have been established during the investigation and a charge sheet has been submitted on 25.07.2025. 8. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the consistent statements of the victim, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 9. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 10. Let the applicant - Satyam Yadav be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. September 9, 2025 S. Shivhare BAIL No. 8424 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench