SHAHNAZ BANO v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BAL VIKAS EVAM PUSHTAHAR AND 6 OTHERS
WRIA/10136/2025 · 2025-09-03
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162020 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162020 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10136 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties no.1 to 6.
2. In view of order being passed, notices to opposite party no.7 stand dispensed with.
3. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority to decide petitioner's representation dated 18.08.2025.
4. Ms. Deepshikha, learned Chief Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of this petition in view of vague nature of prayer made in the petition particularly since there is no assertion that the representation made by petitioner is statutory in nature.
5. In view of such preliminary objection being raised, which is upheld, petition is dismissed granting liberty to file a fresh with the proper pleadings and prayer. September 3, 2025 Subodh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Shahnaz Bano .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Bal Vikas Evam Pushtahar And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench