HITANSHU MAURYA ALIAS PAPPU v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/7372/2025 · 2025-09-03
Saurabh Lavania
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162017 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162017 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7372 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The present application has been filed for the following main relief(s):-
"WHEREFORE it is most respectfully prayed that in the above noted facts and circumstances, this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to quash/set- aside the non-bailable warrant dated 06.02.2025 and the proceedings under section 82 Cr.P.C. and 83 Cr.P.C. vide order dated 13.05.2025 and 10.06.2025 respectively passed by the Additional District Judge-II, Raebareli in Criminal Appeal No.23/2023 (Hitanshu Maurya versus State and another), so far as it relates with the petitioner and the present petition may kindly be allowed and criminal proceedings against the petitioner may kindly be kept in abeyance, in the interest of justice." Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as also the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Inder Mohan Goswami and another vs. State of Uttranchal and others reported in (2007) 12 SCC 1, Sunil Tyagi vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and another reported in 2021 SCC OnLine Del 3597 and Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and the statement of counsel for the applicant that the applicant would appear before the court concerned, it is provided that if the applicant appears before the court concerned within two weeks from Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Suryakant Singh, Saurabh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Hitanshu Maurya Alias Pappu .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. U.P. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
today and moves an appropriate application before the trial court including for recall of non-bailable warrant, the same shall be considered and decided by the trial court expeditiously strictly in accordance with law. For a period of two weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant so far as the proceedings in issue are concerned. In case, the applicant does not appear in terms of this order, coercive action shall be taken against him. The present application is disposed of in above terms. September 3, 2025 Arun/- A482 No. 7372 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench