NAUSHAD ALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/7320/2025 · 2025-09-15
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162015 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162015 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7320 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. At the very outset, Sri Shailender Singh, the learned counsel for the applicant says that the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court, as such, the applicant does not want to press the instant application and it may accordingly be dismissed as not pressed. The aforesaid has not been opposed. In view of the above, the instant application is dismissed as not pressed. September 15, 2025 Arun/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shailender Singh, Ankit Tiwari, Neelam Singh, Ravi Kant Patel Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Naushad Ali .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench