Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162006 (ALL)

VANDANA SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. MEDICAL EDU. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/8569/2025 · 2025-09-03

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8569 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, stating that the petitioner wanted to deposit the fees in terms of the counseling which was conducted for NEET MDS 2023 for which the petitioner has filed representation. Without going into the merits of the case of the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of directing the opposite party no. 2 to pass an order on the application filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law. This order has been passed in presence of Sri Haider Rizvi. September 3, 2025 Anurag Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prabhakar Trivedi, Prashant Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Vandana Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Medical Edu. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench