SHAILENDER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/8232/2025 · 2025-09-22
Rajeev Singh, Rajnish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161991 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161991 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8232 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Heard. 2. This Court had passed the following order on 15.09.2025:-
"1. Heard, Sri Satyendra Nath Verma, Advocate holding brief of Sri Vinod Kumar pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA and Sri Pushpendra Singh,Advocate holding brief of Sri Anurag Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no .4. 2. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:- (i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding/ directing the respondents to conduct a fair and impartial investigation in Case Crime No.0201/2024, under Sections 147, 304, 323 IPC, P.S. Katka, District Ambedkar Nagar, which is contained in Annexure No.1 to this petition. (ii) Direct the transfer of investigation to an independent agency such as CB-CID or CBI or any senior officer outside Ambedkar nagar district. (iii) Provide police protection to the petitioner in view of the threats being extended to him."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had lodged the aforesaid F.I.R. No.0201/2024, but without proper investigation, the final report dated 27.10.2024 was filed. Thereafter the petitioner had filed the protest petition because the final report was filed without considering the medical report of the deceased. Considering the same, the final report was rejected and the matter was remanded for further investigation by means of the order dated 04.03.2025 passed by Civil Judge(J.D.), Tanda/ J.M.Ambedkar Nagar, a copy of which has been placed on record as Annexure No.4 to this petition. He further submits that thereafter no investigation is being done and only the petitioner is being harassed by the police. 4. Learned AGA, on the basis of instructions dated 30.08.2025, provided by Surendra Bahadur Singh, Sub Inspector, Police Station Katka, District Ambedkar Nagar, which Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinod Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Anurag Kumar Singh Shailender .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
has been placed before this Court and taken on record, submits that he has instructions only upto the date of 04.03.2025, by means of which further investigation was directed. 5. In view of above, the concerned Investigating Officer is directed to appear before this Court on the next date alongwith the complete Case Diary. 6.
List on 22.09.2025 as fresh."
3. In deference to the aforesaid order, Sri Surendra Bahadur Singh, Investigating Officer, Police Station Katka, District Ambedkar Nagar is present alongwith the copy of the case diary, which has been produced before this Court. He, on a query, submits that after investigation, the final report No.B 30/25 dated 20.09.2025 has been prepared and the investigation has been concluded. 4. In view of above, this petition has lost it's efficacy. It is accordingly dismissed. September 22, 2025 Akanksha Sri/- CRLP No. 8232 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench