HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6710/2025 Rajaram S/o Shri Jagdish, Resident Of Devgoan, Tunga, Bassi, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector, Jaipur, District Collectorate, Jaipur. 3. Sub-Divisional Officer, Tunga, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Through Its Chairman And Managing Director, Bharat Bhavan, 4 And 6, Currimbhoy Road, Ballard Estate, Mumbai - 400001. 5. Hardik Filling Station, Through Proprietor, Village Dev Gaon, Tehsil Tunga, District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Garvit Khandelwal JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 03/07/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- “a.) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondent No. 4 and 5 to immediately cease the operation of the petrol pump "Hardik Filling Station" located on Khasra No. 73, Dev Gaon, Tehsil Tunga, Jaipur, being 'Charagah' land; b.) Direct the Respondent authorities to take immediate action for restoration and protection of the said pasture land for the benefit of villagers and their cattle; c.) Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also kindly be passed in favour of the Petitioners. d.) Pass any other such order(s) in favour of the Petitioner as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the premises of this case. (2 of 2) [CW-6710/2025] e.) The Cost of the Litigation may kindly be granted to the petitioner.” 2. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking directions against the respondents for seizure of petrol pump situated on the land in question. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the land in question is a pasture land upon which the petrol pump cannot be established. Learned counsel submits that for taking action against the operators of the said petrol pump, several complaints/representations have been submitted before the authorities, but till date no action has been taken, hence, interference of this Court is warranted. 4. Perusal of the record indicates that not a single document has been enclosed with this writ petition, even otherwise also, such direction cannot be issued by this Court. 5. If at all the petitioner is aggrieved by an action of the respondents by not deciding his complaints/representations, he can approach them again by way of filing appropriate representation. 6. In case, any such representation is submitted before the authorities concerned, it is expected from the said authority to hear and decide the same strictly in accordance with law after affording due opportunity of hearing to all the respective parties by passing a reasoned and speaking order. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/32