GHASIRAM MUNDA ALIAS MAJHLA MUNDA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5513/2025 · 2025-07-08
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16199 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16199 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:18316] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.5513 of 2025
------ Ghasiram Munda @ Majhla Munda, aged about 27 years, son of late Mangal Munda, resident of village Dalaikela, P.O. and P.S. Kharsawan, District- Seraikella Kharsawan .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Nath Upadhyay, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.03 Dated-08-07-2025 Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Kuchai P.S. Case No.17 of 2022 (S/1) registered for the offence punishable under Section 302, 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed murder of Bhusan Saw. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR yet he has been implicated in this case on the basis of the confessional statement of the co- accused Lodra Purty, who has already been admitted to bail. It is then submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is then submitted that no T.I. Parade has been conducted in this case and there is no previous enmity of the petitioner with the deceased. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 02.04.2025 as is evident from para-10 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-4 of the supplementary affidavit. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes to co- operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Seraikella in connection with Kuchai P.S. Case No.17 of 2022 (S/1) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/