APHC010212882020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION Between: 1. Perni Subbarao,, S/o. Seetharamanjaneyulu, Aged about 39 years, Occ Cultivation, D.No.13-147, Karamchedu village, and Mandal, Prakasam District. 2. Perni Madhava Rao,, S/o Seetharamanjaneyulu, Aged about 38 years, Occ. Cultivation, R/o. D.No.13 Prakasam District. 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam D 3. The Police Circle Inspector, Karamchedu village, Prakasam District 4. Perni Sreenivasa Rao, S/o Subbarao Aged about 55 years, Hindu, Occ. Intelligence Bureau department, R/o D No 60 Nagar, Vijayawada, Krishna district. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14017 OF 2020 1. Perni Subbarao,, S/o. Seetharamanjaneyulu, Aged about 39 years, Occ 147, Karamchedu village, and Mandal, Prakasam District. 2. Perni Madhava Rao,, S/o Seetharamanjaneyulu, Aged about 38 years, vation, R/o. D.No.13-147, Karamchedu village, and Mandal, ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District. Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Police Circle Inspector, Karamchedu village, Prakasam District 4. Perni Sreenivasa Rao, S/o Subbarao Aged about 55 years, Hindu, Occ. Intelligence Bureau department, R/o D No 60-26-2, Near park, Siddartha da, Krishna district. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. Perni Subbarao,, S/o. Seetharamanjaneyulu, Aged about 39 years, Occ 147, Karamchedu village, and Mandal, Prakasam District. 2. Perni Madhava Rao,, S/o Seetharamanjaneyulu, Aged about 38 years, 147, Karamchedu village, and Mandal, ...Petitioners 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Home Department, istrict. Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Police Circle Inspector, Karamchedu village, Prakasam District 4. Perni Sreenivasa Rao, S/o Subbarao Aged about 55 years, Hindu, Occ. 2, Near park, Siddartha ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring action of the 3rd respondent in interfering in civil dispute between the petitioner and the respondent in O.S. No 195 of 2015 pending in the court of Senior Civil Judge, Parchuru as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and violative of Articles 14, 16, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent not to interfere with the land in the civil dispute in 0.S. No 195 of 2015 in Senior Civil Judge, Parchuru and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd Respondent not to interfere with the land in the civil dispute in O.S. No 195 of 2015 in Senior Civil Judge, Parchuru and pass Counsel for the Petitioners: MARRI VENKATA RAMANA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14017 OF 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring action of the 3rd respondent in interfering in civil dispute between the petitioner and the respondent in O.S. No 195 of 2015 pending in the court of Senior Civil Judge, Parchuru as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and violative of Articles 14, 16, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent not to interfere with the land in the civil dispute in 0.S. No 195 of 2015 in Senior Civil Judge, Parchuru and pass..” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the same, the Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 15.09.2025 KKV THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO:14017 OF 2020 Date: 15.09.2025 KKV