HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5275 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel on behalf of respondent no.1. 2. In view of the proposed order to be passed, notice to respondents no. 2 and 3 is dispensed with. 3. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer to direct the respondent no.1 i.e. Tehsildar Tehsil Alapur, District Ambedkar Nagar to decide the Case No. 294/2025 Computer Case No. T202504040400294 (Bhagirathi Vs. Phoolchand), pending for mutation under Section 34 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Co0e Act, 2006, expeditiously as early as possible, in the interest of justice. 4. It has been submitted that the land recorded in teh name of owner Phoolchand in the revenue record is to be recorded in the name of petitioner on the basis of sale deed for which the mutation case under section 34 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code Act, 2006, is pending before Tehsildar Alapur, District Ambedkar Nagar since 08.01.2025. It has been stated that the matter is urgent and a perusal of the order sheet clearly indicates that though the case is regularly listed but it is routinely adjourned on one pretext or the other. 4. It is noticed that the instant matter relates to 2025 and the trial courts are heavily burdened with the dockets due to which large number of cases are pending before them. In the present case, no extraordinary circumstance has been indicated by the petitioner so as to interfere and pass orders for expeditious disposal of the case which has been filed only in 2025. Accordingly, no case for interference is made out at this stage. 5. However, looking to the aforesaid circumstances, liberty is granted to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prakash Chandra Baranwal, Arjun Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Bhagirathi .....Petitioner(s) Tehsildar, Tehsil Alapur, Ambedkar Nagar And Others .....Respondent(s) the petitioner to move appropriate application before the trial court within next two weeks for expediting the proceedings. In case, such an application is made, the trail court shall consider and decide the same within two weeks thereafter by a reasoned and speaking order. In case, the trial court finds that a case for urgency has been made out, it shall proceed to consider and decide the case of the petitioner expeditiously. 6. With aforesaid direction the petition stands disposed of. September 4, 2025 Muk A227 No. 5275 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench