SHAKEEL AHMAD AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LUCKNOW AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/10054/2025 · 2025-09-02
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161946 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161946 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10054 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayers:-
"I. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the opposite parties to consider the case of petitioners and regularize their services in term of "The Uttar Pradesh Regularization of Person Working on Daily Wages or on Work Charge or on Contract in Government Department on Group-C and Group-D Post (outlside the purview of the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission) Rules-2016" from the date when they became eligible i.e. 12.09.2016 and pay them regular salary, permissible under law alongwith all consequential benefits including its arreas in the interest of justice. II. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the opposite party no. 3 to consider and decide the representation dated 15.05.2025 given by the petitioner no. 1 and representation dated 15.05.2025 given by the petitioner No. 2 in terms of Regularization Rule-2016 contained as Annexure No. 12 to this writ petition."
3. Since consideration of petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to file a fresh individual representation before the opposite party no.3 i.e. District Magistrate, District Ambedkar Nagar who shall consider and decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of.
September 2, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prasiddha Narayan Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
(Manish Mathur,J.) Shakeel Ahmad And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lucknow And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench