Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16194 (AP)

SQA PASHA alias SARDAR QURSHEED ANWAR PASHA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/4476/2025 · 2025-05-14

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI THURSDAY ,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4476 OF 2025 Between: SQA Pasha Alias Sardar Qursheed Anwar Pasha, S/o Gopalam Ramarao, Age. 61 yrs, Muslim, Retd employee, R/o Flat NO. 102, Sri Nivasam Apartments, East Bazar, Near Capital Public School, Gorantia Guntur Andhra Pradesh - 522034 ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Through SHO, Pedakurapadu Ps, Guntur District, Presently Palnadu District Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of of Andhra Pradesh, at Amaravathi ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 482 of BNSS, R/w 438 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to direct the Respondent-Police to enlarge the Petitioners/Accused on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime.No:82/2024 of PEDAKURAPADU Police Station, Guntur District and Presently palnadu District This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri NAINA SHAIK, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor (AP) on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following order: i ' APHC010211952025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) ■ I [3521] V.! ■:h THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4476/2025 Between: Sqa Pasha Alias Sardar Qursheed Anwar Pasha ...PETITIONER/ACCUSE D AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. NAINA SHAIK Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following; ORDER:- Learned counsel for the petitioner/Accused submits that the petitioner has been arrested and remanded to judicial custody. Hence, as the cause does not survive, the present criminal petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as 2. infructuous. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. \ Sd/-G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To 1. The Station House Officer, PEDAKURAPADU Police Station, GUNTUR District, 2. One CC to SRI. NAINA SHAIK, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. [OUT] 4. Three CD Copies nm ( HIGH COURT DATED:15/05/2025 ORDER o^andw)^ CRLP.No.4476 of 2025 5 ft SEt 2025 5 ^ . Current Section ^ DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS