Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161927 (ALL)

HAFIZ ABDUL HASAN @ ABBUL HASAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS

A227/5262/2025 · 2025-09-03

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5262 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents while Sri Pankaj Gupta has accepted notice for the Gaon Sabha- respondent No.3. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents is hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No.2 -Sub Divisional Magistrate, Utraula, District Balrampur to decide case No.05630/2019 (Abdul Hussan Vs. Israil and others) under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Utraula, District Balrampur is directed to decide case No.05630/2019 (Abdul Hussan Vs. Israil and others) under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code expeditiously, say within a period of four months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment. 6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Ghufran Khan, Malik Meraj Ahmad Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Hafiz Abdul Hasan @ Abbul Hasan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) 7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 3, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 5262 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench