TVL.KUMAR SAGO FACTORY v. THE DEPUTY COMMERCIAL TAX
WP/27736/2007 · 2025-02-21
K Govindarajan Thilakavadi, M Sundar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16192 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16192 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.Nos.27736 & 27737 of 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 21.02.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE
M.SUNDAR
and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE
K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
W.P.Nos.27736 & 27737 of 2007 and M.P.Nos.1 & 1 of 2007 Tvl. Kumar Sago Factory Represented by its Partner Mr.Illangkumar ...Petitioner in both WPs Vs The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer Harur. ...Respondent in both WPs Writ Petition No.27736 of 2007 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records on the files of the respondent herein in TNGST.3340982/2004-05 dated 28.06.2007 and quash the same. Writ Petition No.27737 of 2007 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records on the files of the respondent herein in TNGST.3340982/2003-04 dated 28.06.2007 and quash the same. Page Nos.1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Nos.27736 & 27737 of 2007 For Petitioner in both WPs : No appearance For Respondent in both WPs : Mr.C.Harsha Raj Special Government Pleader C O M M O N O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.,] Read this in conjunction with and in continuation of earlier proceedings made in the previous listing on 14.11.2024 which reads as follows: Proceedings in W.P.No.27736 of 2007: 'W.P. No.27736 of 2007 and M.P. No.1 of 2007 M.SUNDAR,J., and K.RAJASEKAR, J., (Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.) In the captioned writ petition, Thiru.R.Senniappan is the lone counsel on record for writ petitioner. Today, we are informed that Thiru.R.Senniappan is no more. We are also further informed that no counsel has come forward to file vakalatnama or represent the writ petitioner saying they have instructions. To be noted, as already alluded to supra, Thiru.R.Senniappan is the lone counsel on record and there is no other co-counsel or juniors on record. Therefore, with the intention of giving opportunity to the writ petitioner, Registry is directed to send notice to the writ petitioner (without insisting on batta from the respondent) and the notice shall be returnable in four weeks i.e., returnable by 12.12.2024.
List on 12.12.2024.' Page Nos.2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Nos.27736 & 27737 of 2007 Proceedings in W.P.No.27737 of 2007: 'W.P. No.27737 of 2007 and M.P. No.1 of 2007 M.SUNDAR,J., and K.RAJASEKAR, J., (Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.) In the captioned writ petition, Thiru.R.Senniappan is the lone counsel on record for writ petitioner. Today, we are informed that Thiru.R.Senniappan is no more. We are also further informed that no counsel has come forward to file vakalatnama or represent the writ petitioner saying they have instructions. To be noted, as already alluded to supra, Thiru.R.Senniappan is the lone counsel on record and there is no other co-counsel or juniors on record. Therefore, with the intention of giving opportunity to the writ petitioner, Registry is directed to send notice to the writ petitioner (without insisting on batta from the respondent) and the notice shall be returnable in four weeks i.e., returnable by 12.12.2024. List on 12.12.2024.'
2. Pursuant to aforementioned proceedings, Registry has sent notice to writ petitioner but the same has been returned with postal acknowledgment 'left'. To be noted, thereafter, there have been multiple listings on 12.12.2024, 19.12.2024, 09.01.2025, 23.01.2025 and
06.02.2025. This Court is informed that writ petitioner has not made any alternate arrangements. Page Nos.3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Nos.27736 & 27737 of 2007
3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of the matter, we find that notice to respondent sent without insisting on batta will suffice and it may not be necessary to resort to substituted service. In this view of the matter, both the captioned Writ Petitions are dismissed for default / non-prosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. [M.S.,J.] [K.G.T.,J.] 21.02.2025 Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order mk To The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer Harur. Page Nos.4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Nos.27736 & 27737 of 2007 M.SUNDAR, J., and K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J., mk W.P.Nos.27736 & 27737 of 2007 21.02.2025 Page Nos.5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis