RAHUL @ RAHUL KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
CRLP/8145/2025 · 2025-09-02
Rajeev Singh, Rajnish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161914 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161914 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8145 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Heard Sri Santosh Kumar Kanaujia, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press this writ petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to avail the remedy of anticipatory bail.
3. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. September 2, 2025 A.Dewal Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Kanaujia Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Rahul @ Rahul Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH DEWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench