Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161907 (ALL)

PUSHPA DEVI v. HARI RAM, NAYAB TAHSILDAR, TAHSIL JALALPUR, AMBEDKAR NAGAR

CAPL/2832/2025 · 2025-09-08

Manish Kumar

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2832 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Sri Prabhakar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant has filed vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent which is taken on record. He has submitted that the proceedings under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, as directed by the writ Court has been decided by order dated 06.09.2025 and the copy of the same has been produced before this Court during course of the argument, which is taken on record and the copy of the same has also been provided to the learned counsel for the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant has very fairly submitted that the judgment and order passed by the writ court has been complied with and for all practical purposes, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. As the judgment and order passed by the writ Court has been complied with, the present contempt petition is dismissed as infructuous. Notice, if any, stands discharged. September 8, 2025 Nitesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abdul Khabeer, Santosh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Manish Kumar,J.) Pushpa Devi .....Applicant(s) Hari Ram, Nayab Tahsildar, Tahsil Jalalpur, Ambedkar Nagar .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench