TRISHIKA ENTERPRISES THRU. PROPRIETOR ANIRUDH KUMAR MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. RURAL DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/8541/2025 · 2025-09-02
Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161906 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161906 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8541 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard Ms. Moni Yadav holding brief of Sri Praveen Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-opposite parties.
2. This writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs:-
"1. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite Parties to re-consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the Government Order dated 26.11.2024, and qualify the firm of the petitioner namely Trishika Enterprises, in the interest of Justice.
2. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party No. 4 to consider the case of the petitioner and decided the representation of the petitioner dated 26.08.2025 contained as ANNEXURE NO.5 in this writ petition."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that this writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. September 2, 2025 Rao/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Praveen Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Trishika Enterprises Thru. Proprietor Anirudh Kumar Maurya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Rural Development Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench