SANJAY KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/5344/2025 · 2025-09-09
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161900 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161900 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5344 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to respondents is hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for a direction for expeditious disposal of application filed by the petitioner U/S 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 registered as Computer Case No. T202402570506879, T202402570506882, T202402570506880 and T202402570506881 (Sanjay Kumar Yadav Vs. Gram Sabha and others).
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case, State-respondent considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 3 -Sub-Divisional Officer, Tehsil - Raniganj, District - Pratapgarh is directed to consider and decide application filed by the petitioner U/S 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 registered as Computer Case No. T202402570506879, T202402570506882, T202402570506880 and T202402570506881 Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Modanwal, Deepak Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Sanjay Kumar Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
(Sanjay Kumar Yadav Vs. Gram Sabha and others) expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 9, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 5344 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench