MUKUND (DIED) THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS v. LOHAR SAI S/O BHAGIRATHI (DIED) (DELETED)
MCC/348/2020 · 2025-01-15
Shri Sanjay K Agrawal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16190 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16190 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 (MCC No. 348 of 2020)
2025:CGHC:2555
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 348 of 2020 1 - Mukund (Died) Through Legal Heirs Nil 1 - (A) Sadhni Bai Wd/o Late Mukund Aged About 80 Years R/o Village Kukurbhuka , Police Station Bagbahar, Tahsil Pathalgaon, District Jashpur , Chhattisgarh 1 - (B) Arjun Ram S/o Late Mukund Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Kukurbhuka , Police Station Bagbahar, Tahsil Pathalgaon, District Jashpur , Chhattisgarh 1 - (C) Jagan Ram (Died) Through Legal Heirs 1 - (C) A. Smt. Dulpati Nayak Wd/o Late Jagan Ram Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Kukurbhuka, Police Station Bagbahar, Tahsil Pathalgaon, District Jashpur , Chhattisgarh., 1- (C) B. Goutam Nayak S/o Late Jagan Ram Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Kukurbhuka , Police Station Bagbahar, Tahsil Pathalgaon, District Jashpur , Chhattisgarh 1 (C) - C. Harsh Nayak S/o Late Jagan Ram Aged About 19 Years R/o Village Kukurbhuka , Police Station Bagbahar, Tahsil Pathalgaon, District Jashpur , Chhattisgarh 1 (C) D. Khushbu Nayak D/o Late Jagan Ram Aged About 14 Years Minor Through Legal Guardian Smt. Dulpati Nayak , R/o Village Kukurbhuka , Police Station Bagbahar, Tahsil Pathalgaon, District Jashpur , Chhattisgarh 1 (C) E. Ganesh Nayak S/o Late Jagan Ram Aged About 5 Years Minor Through Legal Guardian Smt. Dulpati Nayak , R/o Village Kukurbhuka , Police Station Bagbahar, Tahsil Pathalgaon, District Jashpur , Chhattisgarh 1 (D) Magan Ram S/o Late Mukund Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Kukurbhuka, Police Station Bagbahar, Tahsil Pathalgaon, District Jashpur , Chhattisgarh 1 (E) Tiharo Bai D/o Late Mukund Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Ganjhiyadih, Police Station Farsabahar, Tahsil Kunkuri, District Jashpur , Chhattisgarh ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Digitally signed by ADITI DIWAN KAIWART
2 (MCC No. 348 of 2020) 1 (F) Keshav Bai D/o Late Mukund Aged About 55 Years W/o Rupan Ram R/o Village Garrighat, Police Station Farsabahar, Tahsil Kunkuri District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh.
--- Applicant(s) versus 1 - Lohar Sai S/o Bhagirathi (Died) (Deleted) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Jashpur, District- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Tara Bai (Died) (Deleted) W/o Lohar Sai Aged About 60 Years R/o Village- Kukurbhuka, Tahsil - Pathalgaon, District- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Smt. Sukhani Bai W/o Ramdeo Aged About 48 Years R/o Village- Mahuwadih, Tahsil- Farsabahar, District- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Smt. Tiyaso W/o Laxman Aged About 45 Years R/o Bokhi Tahsil Farsabahar, District- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Sewak Sai Lohar Sai Aged About 28 Years R/o Kukurbhuka, Tahsil- Pathalgaon, District- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 7 - Smt. Karmi W/o Krishna Aged About 24 Years R/o Village- Sawatoli Gram Panchayat Kukurbhuka Tahsil- Pathalgaon, District- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 8 - Smt. Dharmi D/o Ramprasad Aged About 22 Years R/o Village- Angaikela, Tahsil- Lailunga, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 9 - Smt. Dhaneshwari D/o Lohar Sai Aged About 19 Years R/o Kukurbhuka,
Tahsil-
Pathalgaon,
District-Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. (All 3 To 9 Are Lrs. Of Deceased Respondent No. 1 Lohar Sai.),
--- Non-applicant(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant
:- Mr. R. V. Rajwade, Advocate For Non-applicant-State :- Mr. Amit Buxy, Panel Lawyer For Non-applicant Nos.6 to 9 :- Mr. Vivek Bhakta, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board
15.01.2025
1. Heard on IA No.01, which is an application seeking condonation of delay in filing the application for restoration
3 (MCC No. 348 of 2020) of Second Appeal No. 463/2004. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, I.A. No.1 is allowed and the delay caused in filing the instant MCC is hereby condoned. 3. Also heard on IA No.02, which is an application for deleting the name of non-applicant No.3. 4. For the reasons stated in the application, I.A. No.2 is allowed. Let the name of non-applicant No.3 be deleted from the cause-title of this MCC, during the course of the day. 5. With the consent of the parties, heard finally. 6. This MCC has been filed seeking restoration of Second Appeal No.463/2004, which was dismissed for want of prosecution by order of this Court dated 23.08.2019. 7. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Second Appeal No.463/2004 is restored to its original number for its hearing and disposal in accordance with law. 8. Accordingly, this MCC is allowed. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge @d!t!