HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8568 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved against the appointment of opposite party no. 4 and 5 as B.L.O. The grievance of the petitioner is that the opposite party nos. 4 and 5 may not be neutral. Without going into the merits of the contention, specific prescriptions are contained in Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Registration of Electors) Rules, 1994. The petitioner may avail the remedy as is prescribed in the said rules, in accordance with law. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. September 3, 2025 Anurag Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Farooq Ayoob, Mansi Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary, C.S.C. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Sheikh Noman Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Election Commission Thru. Secy. Up, Lucknow And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench