SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 2025:UHC:10095 WPCRL No.1249 of 2025 With (Compromise Appl. No.02 of 2025) Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Gaurav Singh and Mr. Vaibhav Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the Petitioners. 2. Mr. Girish Chandra Joshi, learned AGA for the State. 3. Mr. Birendra Singh Adhikari, learned counsel for Respondent No.4. 4. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India alongwith compounding application i.e. paper no.36 which is supported with the affidavits of petitioners and respondent no.4 and the same is endorsed by learned counsel for the parties. 5. Petitioners as well as respondent no.4 are present in the Court. They are duly identified by their respective counsel. 6. By means of this writ petition, petitioners, have sought quashing of the impugned FIR No.798 of 2025 dated 04.08.2025 under Section 109, 115(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 351(2) & 352 of B.N.S. at Police Station Laksar, District Haridwar. Further prayer has been made to direct respondent no.2 & 3 not to arrest the petitioners pursuant to aforesaid FIR. 7. Learned counsel for the parties have filed their respective affidavits along with the compounding application stating therein that they do not wish to pursue the present criminal case any further and a compromise has been entered between them. 8. Learned State counsel has submitted medical of the injured pressing the seriousness of the injuries. He has opposed the compromise application and submits that in the present matter the injured got hurt due to misuse of fire arm in the conflict between the parties. 9. This Court has interacted with the parties and especially the injured Afjal who makes a statement before this Court that there was a scuffle between the parties and he does not know who hit him; he further submits that he does not wish to pursue the matter any further as the matter has been amicably settled with the guidance of the seniors of the village. 10. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 11. In view of the principle of law laid down by Ho’ble the Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303, criminal proceedings can be quashed by this Court, if this Court is satisfied that matter has been settled between the parties amicably and parties are interest to restore peace and harmony between them. 12. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in view of the above, the compounding application is allowed. The impugned FIR No.798 of 2025 dated 04.08.2025 under Section 109, 115(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 351(2) & 352 of B.N.S. at Police Station Laksar, District Haridwar is hereby quashed. 13. Accordingly instant writ petition stands disposed of. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 14.11.2025 Arti ARTI SINGH Digitally signed by ARTI SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=487ed955e722ba65aab55409e686c12fb83a19325e8b66890fbee418e7b69c0d, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26DC90E00D839E3E8714131F235087D2D87E133C57E7F4A7B2E734BE2521F982, cn=ARTI SINGH Date: 2025.11.14 17:27:49 +05'30'