Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161851 (ALL)

DEVENDRANATH JAINATH SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 7 OTHERS

WPIL/918/2025 · 2025-09-09

Pankaj Bhatia

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 918 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and Sri Mohan Singh who appears for the Gaon Sabha. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer : "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party No. 1, 2 & 3 to take action against the illegal revenue record entry which is being made by opposite party No.4 to 7, in public interest." 3. Standing Counsel, based upon the instructions, states that the Gram Panchayat has already filed an application under section 34 for correction of the revenue entries, which is pending. The instructions are taken on record. 4. In view thereof, no good ground for interference, at the instance of the petitioner, is made out. 5. The petition is disposed off. September 9, 2025 VNP/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Nayak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Devendranath Jainath Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench