RAGHVENDRA KUMAR MISHRA v. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, TEHSIL SOHAWAL, AYODHYA AND OTHERS
A227/5264/2025 · 2025-09-03
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161843 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161843 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5264 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents is hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for a direction to respondent No.1 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil- Sohawal, District Ayodhya to decide case No.3879/2023, computerized case No.T 202304230203879 under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code for partition of gata No.266, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil- Sohawal, District Ayodhya is directed to decide case No.3879/2023, computerized case No.T 202304230203879 under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code for partition of gata No.266 expeditiously, say within a period of six months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment.
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
7. With above observations/directions, the petition stands disposed of. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Surya Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Raghvendra Kumar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Sohawal, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s)
September 3, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 5264 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench