Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161840 (ALL)

MRS.REKHA NIGAM AND ANOTHER v. UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. MINISTRY OF FINANCE NEW DELHI AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/8527/2025 · 2025-09-09

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8527 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit, filed by learned counsel for the petitioners, is taken on record. Counter affidavit, filed on behalf of the respondent no.4, is also taken on record. 2. Shri Amol Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the A.D.M. concerned, who has passed the order under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act mainly on the ground that according to the petitioner, the order was obtained by mis-represenation of facts. 3. Without going into the contention of counsel for the petitioners, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take such steps as may be available under law. 4. This order has been passed in the presence of Shri Vinay Shanker, learned counsel for Union Bank of India/opposite party no.4. September 9, 2025 Praveen Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amol Kumar Srivastava, Dina Nath Saha Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Vinay Shankar (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Mrs.Rekha Nigam And Another .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Finance New Delhi And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench