Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16184 (KAR)

SRI.K.R.LAKSHMI NARAYANA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/3735/2021 · 2025-01-07

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:402 WP No. 3735 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 3735 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. K.R.LAKSHMI NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O LATE K.RAMAIAH, RESIDING NO.35, LISHANTH NILAYA, 3RD MAIN, CHOWDAPPA BLOCK, SULTAN PALYA, BENGALURU - 560 032. 2. SRI. VISHU KUMAR AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O LATE RANGA SWAMY, RESIDING AT NO.006, SAI BRUNDAVANA APARTMENT, ANUGRUHA LAYOUT, 2ND STAGE, BILEKAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 076. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HARISHA S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SHESHADRI N. S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT YOUTH SERVICE AND SPORTS, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH, EMPOWERMENT AND SPORTS, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:402 WP No. 3735 of 2021 NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Sheshadri.N.S., counsel for the petitioners and Sri.Mahantesh Shettar., AGA for the respondents have appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representations submitted by the petitioners on 22.05.2020 & 18.05.2020 vide Annexures-E & F. 3. Counsel Sri.Sheshadri.N.S., submits that a direction may be issued to the respondents to consider the representation submitted by the petitioners. 4. AGA submits that an appropriate order may be passed. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:402 WP No. 3735 of 2021 5. The oral submission made by counsel for the respective parties is placed on record. 6. The petitioners grievance is that they made representations in the year 2020 and the same have not been considered as of today. Hence, a Mandamus is ordered directing the respondents to consider the representations submitted by the petitioners on 22.05.2020 & 18.05.2020 vide Annexures-E & F in accordance with the law, if not considered as of today within eight weeks from the receipt of the certified copy of this order. 7. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 3 Sl No.: 98