HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10039 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Chandra Shekhar Sinha, learned counsel appearing for all the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. 3. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been placed under suspension vide order dated 20.02.2023 and despite sufficient time having lapsed, he has still not been reinstated in service. 4. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.5 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which Sri Chandra Shekhar Sinha, learned counsel appearing for all the respondents has no objection. 5. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent No.5 then the respondent No.5 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Shukla, Dinesh Kumar Roy, Santosh Kumar Ramakant Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : Chandra Shekhar Sinha Vijay Kumar Shukla .....Petitioner(s) Managing Director / Chief Executive Officer Union Bank Of India Mumbai And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. September 2, 2025 cks/- WRIA No. 10039 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench