Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16183 (AP)

Thandlam Damodar Reddy v. State of A.P.,

WP/9336/2019 · 2025-09-21

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010212022019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 9336/2019 Between: 1. THANDLAM DAMODAR REDDY, S/O. THANDLAM SRINIVASAS REDDY, AGED 35 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O. PAPANAIDUPETA, YERPEDU(M), CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF A P, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICEURBAN, TIRUPATI URBAN, TIRUPATI. 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE/SDPO, RENIGUNTA SUB DIVISION, .RENIGUNTA CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, YERPEDU P.S., YERPEDU,CHITTOOR DIST., 5. G KRISHNA MURTHY, S/O. GOPAL R/O. JYOTHINAGAR, CPD COLONY, RENIGUNTA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. PREM KUMAR, AO YERPEDU MANDAL,YERPEDU, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2 7. RAMBABU, SURVEYOR APIIC, RENIGUNTA,TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ/Order/Direction more particularly one in the nature of the Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not registering a Crime pursuant to complaint dated 12.07.2019 of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction besides violation of Art.14 8621 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to register a Crime pursuant to complaint dated 12.07.2019 of the petitioner forthwith by giving protection IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th Respondent to register a Crime against named individuals therein pursuant to complaint dt.12.07.2019 of the petitioner forthwith by giving protection pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAJENDRA C Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO:9336 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: This Court after perusing the earlier proceedings gave a direction on 08.09.2025, to list the matter under the caption „For Dismissal‟. Though several adjournments are granted, learned counsel for the petitioner fails to prosecute the present Writ Petition in spite of matter is being listed under the caption “for dismissal”. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 22.09.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 9336 of 2019 Date: 22.09.2025 PSA