ALEEM KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. TRANSPORT DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/10012/2025 · 2025-09-02
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161808 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161808 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10012 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1 and Sri R.D.Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.2 and 3. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has not been granted the benefit of the ACP despite the circular dated 20.06.2025 having been issued by the Corporation. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.3 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1 and Sri R.D.Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.2 and 3 have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within ten days from today before the respondent No.3 then the respondent No.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of three months from Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shyam Narayan Shukla, Diwakar Pratap Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ratnesh Chandra Aleem Khan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Transport Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. In case any payment is found due to the petitioner, the same be paid expeditiously to the petitioner. September 2, 2025 Pachhere/- WRIA No. 10012 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench