Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1618 (UTT)

CHANCHAL SINGH AND ANR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/56/2025 · 2025-02-06

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.56 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. M.C. Upadhyay, Advocate for the petitioners. 2. Mr. Vipul Painuly, B.H. for the State. 3. Amendment/Correction Application (MCRC No.2 of 2025) 4. Today the matter is listed on an amendment/correction application, in which it is pleaded to amend the memo of parties and array S.H.O., P.S. Ranipur, District Haridwar in place of S.H.O. P.S. Jwalapur, District Haridwar as respondent no.3 in the memo of parties and to direct the S.H.O. P.S Ranipur, District Haridwar in place of S.H.O. P.S. Jwalapur, District Haridwar for providing police protection to petitioners in the order dated 06.02.2025. 5. The amendment sought for is formal in nature, therefore, it is not opposed by learned State counsel. 6. Accordingly, amendment/correction application is allowed. 7. AS prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary amendment as sought for in the present application during the course of the day. 8. Resultantly, the order dated 06.02.2025 passed by this Court is modified/amended only to the extent that the S.H.O. P.S. Ranipur, District Haridwar shall provide necessary protection to the petitioners, as directed in the aforesaid order. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 11.02.2025 SK