PANNA LAL AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE DISTT. AMBEDKAR NAGAR AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/8661/2025 · 2025-09-11
Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161771 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161771 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8661 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for the State-opposite parties, Shri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.5 and perused the record.
2. This writ petition has been filed by petitioners with following main prayer(s):
"I. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the Opp. Parties not to construct Nali and drainage pit in front of Petitioners' house, in the interest of justice."
3. It is the case of the petitioners that they are living in 'abaadi' land bearing Gata Nos.665, 666, 667. Gata No.668 is recorded as 'Naveen Parti', which is surrounded by Gata No.665, 666 and 667. There are 20 families, who are using Gata No.668 as their 'sahan', but now opposite parties are adamant to make 'naali' on Gata No.668, which will disturb the petitioners and other villagers' 'sahan'. Hence this writ petition has been filed with the aforesaid prayer.
4. Learned Standing Counsel and Shri Mohan Singh, on the basis of instructions state that one Krishna Pal s/o Ramnet has made an application for shifting existing 'naali'/constructing new 'naali' western south side of his house. However, a spot inspection was carried out and it was found that if such 'naali' is constructed, Gata No.669ka, 670, 669Kha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manish Mani Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Panna Lal And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate Distt. Ambedkar Nagar And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
and 668, which are recorded as 'banjar', 'naveen parti', 'dahar' and 'naveen parti', respectively, shall be affected and therefore, such 'naali' is not being constructed. The instructions are kept on record.
5. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. September 11, 2025 Anupam S/- WRIC No. 8661 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench