MOHAN SINGH DHAKAD S/O LATE SHRI KALLANSINGH DHAKAD v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/2348/2025 · 2025-09-08
Sudesh Bansal
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16177 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16177 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:35820] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2348/2025 Mohan Singh Dhakad S/o Late Shri Kallansingh Dhakad, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Bada Nagla,itamada, Police Station Bhusawar, District Bharatpur (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. Superintendent Of Police, District Bharatpur.
4. Station House Officer, Police Station Bhusawar, District Bharatpur (Raj).
5. Investigation Officer In The Fir No. 46/2025 Registered At Police Station Bhusawar, District Bharatpur.
6. Rakesh Kumar S/o Rattiram, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Darapur, Chiksana District Bharatpur At Present Posted At Police Station Bhusawar District Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumer Chand Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Udao Singh, ASI, P.S. Bhusawar, District Bharatpur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order 08/09/2025
1. In compliance of order dated 07.08.2025, Investigating Officer is present in person and has submitted a progress report of investigation dated 07.09.2025. The progress report is taken on record.
2. As per progress report, it has come on record that in the investigation, more particularly in the statements of co-accused- Ashok, that the act of unlawful betting was being done by him for and on behest of petitioner- Mohan Singh Dhakad. In that view, prima facie offences under Section 13 of RPGO and Section 112(2)
[2025:RJ-JP:35820] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2348/2025] of BNS, 2023, have been found established against Ashok as well as petitioner- Mohan Singh Dhakad.
3. In view of above, no case is make to quash the impugned FIR No.46/2025 and counsel for petitioner does not press the petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same.
4. Permission is granted.
5. Accordingly, the present misc. petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
6. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/4