Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161768 (ALL)

ARTI YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF BAL VIKAS SEWA EVAM PUSHTAHAR LKO. AND 7 OTHERS

WRIA/10056/2025 · 2025-09-02

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10056 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties who has been provided written instructions dated 28.08.2025, which is taken on record. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority not to take any coercive measure against petitioner pursuant to cancellation of her Income Certificate dated 30.03.2024. 3. It has been submitted that petitioner had been appointed as Aganbadi Worker in the centre concerned but her Income Certificate has stands now cancelled, against which an appeal has already been preferred and is pending consideration. 4. In view of aforesaid submissions, the concerned authority is directed to take a final decision with regard to petitioner's pending appeal expeditiously within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produce before the concerned authority. Continuance of petitioner on the post of Aganbadi Worker in terms of such selection shall be subject to final outcome of the appeal. 5. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. September 2, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Indu Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Arti Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Bal Vikas Sewa Evam Pushtahar Lko. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench