Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161759 (ALL)

RAVINDRA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/8179/2025 · 2025-09-04

Rajeev Singh, Rajnish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8179 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. Heard Sri Rajendra Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. This petition has been filed seeking following main relief:- "(i) To issue a writ, order or direction of or in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned FIR/Case Crime No.116/2024, F.I.R. dated 30.04.2024, under Sections 120-B, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station Hazratganj, District Lucknow as contained in Annexure No.1 to the writ petition." Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned FIR has been lodged with incorrect facts because the diploma was not submitted by the petitioner as he is graduate and post graduate. He further submits that the petitioner was not selected, therefore, question of submission of documents with the opposite party No.3 for verification could not arise. He further submits that the petitioner has already been granted benefit of anticipatory bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 07.08.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/s 438 Cr.P.C. No.870 of 2025 (Ravindra Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Another). Learned A.G.A. submits that he could not get the instructions in the matter. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajendra Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Ravindra Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Having considered the submission of learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of FIR, the commissioning of offence cannot be ruled out and plea or material of petitioner cannot be considered at this stage by this Court and can be considered in investigation in accordance with law. It is apparent that the FIR was lodged on 30.04.2024, investigation of which should have been completed by now, however, it has not been completed till now, therefore, without entering into the merits of this case, the petition is disposed of with direction to the Commissioner of Police, Lucknow to get the investigation concluded and forward a report to the concerned court expeditiously and the petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation. September 4, 2025 Saurabh CRLP No. 8179 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench