Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161750 (ALL)

SHRIMATI JAGPATI AND 6 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/7288/2025 · 2025-09-02

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7288 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for the following main relief(s):- "it is most respectfully prayed that in the interest of justice this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the Summoning order dated 28/04/2025, along with entire proceeding arising out of Complaint No 14/2024 dated 28/04/2005, passed by Learned Additional Judicial Magistrate 2nd Ayodhya, on the basis of the complaint No. 14/2024, Under Section-452,323,504,506 IPC, at P.S.- Haidarganj District- Ayodhya in the interest of justice. It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to stay the Summoning order dated 28/04/2025, along with entire proceeding arising out of complaint no 14/2024 dated 28/04/2005,, passed by Learned Judicial Magistrate 2nd, Ayodhya, on the basis of the complaint No. 14/2024, Under Section-452,323,504,506 IPC, at P.S.- Haidarganj, District- Ayodhya in the interest of justice." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicant to file bail application Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Akhil Kumar Singh, Gyanendra Pratap Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shrimati Jagpati And 6 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) before the trial court, which may be decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351: (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicant applies for bail before the Court concerned, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observation made in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer/Court concerned that for a period of 30 days from today or till the applicant applies for bail, whichever is earlier, he would not take any coercive action against the applicant in the aforesaid case. It is made clear that in this regard no application shall be entertained. With the aforesaid observations, the present application is disposed of. September 2, 2025 Anurag A482 No. 7288 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench