Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16175 (ALL)

RAVI KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P.

NABAIL/1948/2025 · 2025-03-09

Deepak Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:34601 Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1948 of 2025 Applicant :- Ravi Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajshekhar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant an anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No.333 of 2024, under Sections 323, 307, 452, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station- Gorakhnath, District- Gorakhpur. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that both the parties have lodged FIR and received injuries. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed prayer for anticipatory bail and submitted that charge-sheet has been submitted against the applicant. 5. The relief as sought by the applicant through this application is refused. 6. However, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicant, it is directed that if applicant surrenders before the concerned Court below within three weeks from today and applies for regular bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922. 7. For the period of three weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him. 8. With the aforesaid directions, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 10.3.2025 SKD Digitally signed by :- SURJIT KUMAR DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad