2025:HHC:18139 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9447 of 2025 Date of Decision: June 6, 2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Raj Mal ……...Petitioner Versus HRTC and others …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashishta, Advocate. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Precisely, the grouse of the petitioner, as has been highlighted in the petition and further canvassed by Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate is that the revision petition filed by the petitioner against order passed by Regional Manager/Divisional Manager, HRTC imposing penalty of censure, stoppage of increment and penalty of Rs.63,430/- is not being decided, as a result of which, petitioner is suffering. 2. Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashishta, Advocate, while accepting notice on behalf of respondents, fairly states that the revision petition filed by petitioner shall be decided expeditiously. 3. In view of above, present petition is disposed of, without going into the merits of the case, with a direction to the Managing Director, HRTC to decide the revision petition filed by the petitioner, against order passed by Regional Manager/ Divisional Manager, expeditiously, preferably within a period of two weeks, from today. Needless to say, afore authority, while deciding the revision 2025:HHC:18139 petition shall afford opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass a speaking order thereupon. All pending applications stand disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma) Judge June 6, 2025 Vikrant) 2