Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161732 (ALL)

AJAY KUMAR RAWAT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. MEDICAL AND HEALTH SERVICES LUCKNOW AND ANOTHER

WRIA/10070/2025 · 2025-09-02

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10070 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties, who has been provided written instructions dated 01.09.2025, which is taken on record. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking direction to authority concerned for considering petitioner's transfer from Siddhartha Nagar to Hardoi in view of clause 5(iv) of Government Order dated 06.05.2025. 3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Director (Administration), Medical and Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously in terms of the relevant clauses of Government Order dated 06.05.2025, in case the same are applicable, within a period of three weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order. 4. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. September 2, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Savita Jain, Raj Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Ajay Kumar Rawat .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Medical And Health Services Lucknow And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench