( 2025:JHHC:18342 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5526 of 2025 ------ Angad Kumar son of Vijay Prasad age about 25 years, Resident of Bhatiya Basti, Adityapur, P.O. and P.S. Adityapur, District- Seraikella-Kharsawan. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Nath Upadhyay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sudhir Kr. Mahto, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 08-07-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No.206 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No.507 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner files a supplementary affidavit. Keep the same in the record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons committed murder of the son of the informant namely Vivek Kumar Singh. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of the co- accused person. It is next submitted that charge sheet has already been submitted against the petitioner. It is next submitted that except confessional statement, there is no material in the record to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is next submitted that no witness has been examined as yet, by the trial court. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 02.08.2024 as is evident from para-18 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the co-accused has already been admitted to bail by the co- ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 27.02.2025 passed in B.A. No.10798 of 2024. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Seraikella in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No.206 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No.507 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/