RAGHUNANDAN SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/10032/2025 · 2025-09-02
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161717 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161717 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10032 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority for providing regular pension and gratuity alongwith interest and for granting benefit of one additional increment w.e.f. 01.07.2006 in terms of Government Order dated 01.05.2012. Annual increment for the period 2018- 2019 due on 01.07.2019 has also been sought.
3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before the opposite party no.3 i.e. Sub Divisional Officer, District Amethi who shall consider and decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. September 2, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Raghunandan Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench