Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161714 (ALL)

OM PRAKASH AND 20 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDU. DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/10049/2025 · 2025-09-02

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10049 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Rajesh Shukla, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents No.1 & 2, Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.3 and Sri Arun Kumar Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent No.4. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioners may be permitted to submit fresh representations before respondent No.4 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which Sri Rajesh Shukla, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents No.1 & 2, Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.3 and Sri Arun Kumar Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent No.4 have no objection. 4. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioners submit individual representations within two weeks from today before respondent No.4, then respondent No.4 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of submission of the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prem Chandra Chauhan, Kashi Ram Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rishabh Tripathi Om Prakash And 20 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) representations along with certified copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. September 2, 2025 cks/- WRIA No. 10049 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench