Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161709 (ALL)

RAJESH KUMAR SAROJ @ RAJESH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/7340/2025 · 2025-09-02

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7340 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant application under section 482 Cr.P.C./528 of the B.N.S.S. has been filed with the prayer to quash the charge-sheet no.544/2020 dated 14.12.2020 filed in Case Crime No.0684/2020, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 and 494 IPC lodged at Police Station Lalganj, District Pratapgarh, to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.456/2022 (State Vs. Geeta Devi and others), pending in the Court of learned Civil Judge (S.D.)/A.C.J.M., Lalganj Ajhara, District Pratapgarh and to quash the summoning orders dated 20.10.2022 and 08.07.2025 passed in the aforesaid case. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and was never involved in committing the offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. He added that due to enmity, his name has been planted in the first information report and thereafter he has been charge-sheeted. He next added that due to unavoidable circumstances, he could not appear before the trial below. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhishek Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajesh Kumar Saroj @ Rajesh Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. 6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties', it is provided that in case, the applicant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and files bail application, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7. The application is disposed of accordingly. September 2, 2025 MVS/- A482 No. 7340 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench