HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7910 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the following relief:- "WHEREFORE it is prayed that the charge sheet of Case No. 3969/2023, State Vs. Raghuveer Singh @ Sonu Walia, pending in the Court of J.M.-II, Lucknow, vide Crime No. 55/2019, U/s 504/506 IPC, PS- Alambagh, Lucknow may be quashed. It is further prayed that the proceedings of Case No. 3969/2023, State Vs. Raghuveer Singh @ Sonu Walia, pending in the Court of J.M. 11, Lucknow, vide Crim: No. 55/2019, U/s 504/506 IPC, PS- Alambagh, Lucknow may be quashed. It is further prayed that the proceedings of Case No. 3969/2023, State Vs. Raghuveer Singh @ Sonu Walia, pending in the Court of J.M.-II, Lucknow, vide Crime No. 55/2019, U/s 504/506 IPC, PS- Alambagh, Lucknow may be stayed during the pendency of the present petition before this Hon'ble Court. It is further prayed that the summoning order dated 20.03.2023 summoning the applicant to face trial U/s 504/506 IPC by the Court of J.M.-II, Lucknow may also be quashed." Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Hemant Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Raghuveer Singh Walia @ Sonu Walia .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicant is not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. 6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and files bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7. The application is disposed off accordingly. September 17, 2025 Mohd. Sharif A482 No. 7910 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench