Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161699 (MAD)

V.Sivaraman v. The Tahsildar

WP(MD)/24024/2025 · 2025-09-08

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)NO.24024 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :08.09.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P(MD)No.24024 of 2025 V.Sivaraman ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Tahsildar, Madurai East Taluk Office, Kathakinaru Village, Madurai East Taluk, Madurai District. 2. The Head Surveyor, Madurai East Taluk Office, Kathakinaru Village, Madurai East Taluk, Madurai District. 3. R.Diwagar ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to survey the petitioner's land in survey No.23/2E5 for a total extent of 2 1/2 cents situated at Kathakinaru Village, Madurai East Taluk, Madurai District, based on the petitioner's representation in person with acknowledgement dated 21.07.2025. For Petitioner : Mr. S.Vidhya Sagar 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)NO.24024 of 2025 For R1 & R2 : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader O R D E R After submitting an application for survey of the land in Survey No.23/2E5, present Writ Petition was filed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies on a sale deed dated 14.05.1983 and patta No.444 to assert the petitioner's right to have a survey conducted in respect of the relevant land. 3. Learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2. He submits that the survey would be conducted within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. The petitioner had filed the sale deed dated 14.05.1983 in his favour and the patta issued to him in respect of the relevant survey number. In the circumstances, the petitioner has made out a case to consider the request for conduct of the survey. The third respondent 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)NO.24024 of 2025 appears to have objected to the conduct of such survey. Therefore, it is just and necessary that the third respondent's objection be considered in this regard. Such objection shall be considered by the first and second respondents before taking a decision. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the first and second respondents to act on the petitioner's application dated 21.07.2025 seeking survey after putting the petitioner and the third respondent on notice and considering their objections, if any. This exercise shall be completed within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. NCS : Yes/No 08.09.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No apd To 1. The Tahsildar, Madurai East Taluk Office, Kathakinaru Village, Madurai East Taluk, Madurai District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)NO.24024 of 2025 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY.,J. apd 2. The Head Surveyor, Madurai East Taluk Office, Kathakinaru Village, Madurai East Taluk, Madurai District. ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.24024 of 2025 08.09.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis